First
Prev
- SUMMATIONS
- THE POSSIBILITY OF REVELATION
- THE HIDDEN NATURE OF THE CREATOR
- THE PROVIDENT REALITY AND THE EQUALITY OF RAIN
- FREE MINDS AND FREE WILL
- AN ORDERED UNIVERSE--MADE TO ORDER?
- (A) PURPOSE FOR THE UNIVERSE
- COMMONALITIES
- VOICES AND PRESENCES
- SPECIAL CLAIMS, SPECIFIC EVIDENCE
- DO AS I SAY, NOT AS I DO
- ARROGANCE AND FAITH
- IMPLICATIONS AND SUGGESTIVE CLUES
- SOCIAL RELATIVISM ISN'T RELEVANT, PART TWO
- SOCIAL RELATIVISM ISN'T RELEVANT, PART ONE
- SOCIOBIOLOGY'S SHORTCOMINGS, PART TWO
- SOCIOBIOLOGY'S SHORTCOMINGS, PART ONE
- DODGING IMPLICATIONS
- EXISTENTIAL CRISIS IN EXISTENCE
- THE PROBLEM OF VALUES
- THE PROBLEM OF EVIL (PROLOGUE)
- TORNADO IN JUNK SCIENCE
- CHOOSING AMONG THE EXPLANATIONS
- EXPLANATION SIX: SOME IMPLICATIONS
- EXPLANATION SIX: SOMEONE ELSE'S LAB EXPERIMENT
- EXPLANATION SIX: THINKING CREATIVELY: APPROACHES AND LIMITS
- EXPLANATION SIX: THINKING CREATIVELY OR REWINDING THE WATCHMAKER
- EXPLANATION FIVE: SMOLIN'S SELECTION
- EXPLANATION FOUR: ENSEMBLES: AN OVERVIEW
- EXPLANATION FOUR: UNIVERSALITY IN MANY-WORLDS: DOES EVERYTHING POSSIBLE EXIST...SOMEWHERE?
- EXPLANATION FOUR: UNIVERSALITY IN MANY-WORLDS: HAVING YOUR CAKE AND EATING IT TOO.
- EXPLANATION FOUR: UNIVERSALITY IN MANY-WORLDS: INTERPRETING THEIMPOSSIBLE
- EXPLANATION FOUR: UNIVERSALITY IN MANY-WORLDS: PROLOGUE (IMPOSSIBLE BUT TRUE)
- EXPLANATION FOUR: UNIVERSALITY IN TIME: DEJA VIEW
- EXPLANATION FOUR: UNIVERSALITY IN SPACE: BEYOND THE FIELDS WE KNOW
- EXPLANATION FOUR: UNIVERSES ENSEMBLE! (Or--Multiple Choice!)
- EXPLANATION THREE: NECESSITY IS THE MOTHER OF...CREATION?
- EXPLANATION TWO: HIGH PROBABILITY---POSSIBLY
- EXPLANATION ONE: TAKE A CHANCE
- SIX COINCIDENCE CAUSES
- THE PHILOSOPHER'S FIRING SQUAD
- COINCIDENCE TWELVE: QUANTUM OF SCIENCE or SOMETIMES BOHR-ING IS GOOD
- COINCIDENCE ELEVEN: EXPANDING CONSTANTLY, PART TWO
- COINCIDENCE ELEVEN: EXPANDING CONSTANTLY, PART ONE
- COINCIDENCE TEN: A FINE LINE, or THE ALPHA FAIL
- OBJECTION TWO: THE PUDDLE IN THE DESERT
- COINCIDENCE NINE: ANTIMATTER ANGST AND ANOMALIES
- COINCIDENCE EIGHT: Neutron-Proton Mass Differences, or Sometimes it doesn't Pay to be Neutral
- OBJECTION ONE: The Size of the Universe
- COINCIDENCE SEVEN--You'll Get a Charge Out of This.
- COINCIDENCE SIX: 1/1836 IS YOUR LUCKY NUMBER.
- SETUP FOR COINCIDENCE SIX AND SEVEN
- PAUSE FOR REFLECTION: WAP, SAP, FAP, PAP And CRAP
- COINCIDENCE FIVE, Page 2: HIGHER DIMENSION DILEMMA
- COINCIDENCE FIVE, Page One: TWO-DIMENSIONAL CHARACTERS
- COINCIDENCE FOUR: HOW STRONG A CASE?
- A WEAK CASE FOR A WEAKLESS UNIVERSE
- COINCIDENCE THREE (A Weak Grasp of Timing)
- COINCIDENCE TWO, Page Four (Made Perfect in Weakness)
- COINCIDENCE TWO, Page 3 (Cooking a Supernova)
- COINCIDENCE TWO, Page Two (the Ghostly Particles)
- COINCIDENCE TWO, Page One (The Setup)
- COINCIDENCE ONE, Page Seven (Qualifications and Updates)
- COINCIDENCE ONE, Page Six (Eliminating Aliens)
- COINCIDENCE ONE, Page 5 (Goldilocks and the Just-Right Resonances)
- COINCIDENCE ONE, Page 4 (Remarkable Resonances)
- COINCIDENCE ONE, PAGE 3 (The Briefness of Beryllium)
- COINCIDENCE ONE, Page 2
- COINCIDENCE ONE, Page 1
- INTRODUCTION (EVOLUTION), Page 3
- INTRODUCTION (GROUND RULES), Page 2
- INTRODUCTION , Page 1
Next
Last
First
Prev
- SUMMATIONS
- THE POSSIBILITY OF REVELATION
- THE HIDDEN NATURE OF THE CREATOR
- THE PROVIDENT REALITY AND THE EQUALITY OF RAIN
- FREE MINDS AND FREE WILL
- AN ORDERED UNIVERSE--MADE TO ORDER?
- (A) PURPOSE FOR THE UNIVERSE
- COMMONALITIES
- VOICES AND PRESENCES
- SPECIAL CLAIMS, SPECIFIC EVIDENCE
- DO AS I SAY, NOT AS I DO
- ARROGANCE AND FAITH
- IMPLICATIONS AND SUGGESTIVE CLUES
- SOCIAL RELATIVISM ISN'T RELEVANT, PART TWO
- SOCIAL RELATIVISM ISN'T RELEVANT, PART ONE
- SOCIOBIOLOGY'S SHORTCOMINGS, PART TWO
- SOCIOBIOLOGY'S SHORTCOMINGS, PART ONE
- DODGING IMPLICATIONS
- EXISTENTIAL CRISIS IN EXISTENCE
- THE PROBLEM OF VALUES
- THE PROBLEM OF EVIL (PROLOGUE)
- TORNADO IN JUNK SCIENCE
- CHOOSING AMONG THE EXPLANATIONS
- EXPLANATION SIX: SOME IMPLICATIONS
- EXPLANATION SIX: SOMEONE ELSE'S LAB EXPERIMENT
- EXPLANATION SIX: THINKING CREATIVELY: APPROACHES AND LIMITS
- EXPLANATION SIX: THINKING CREATIVELY OR REWINDING THE WATCHMAKER
- EXPLANATION FIVE: SMOLIN'S SELECTION
- EXPLANATION FOUR: ENSEMBLES: AN OVERVIEW
- EXPLANATION FOUR: UNIVERSALITY IN MANY-WORLDS: DOES EVERYTHING POSSIBLE EXIST...SOMEWHERE?
- EXPLANATION FOUR: UNIVERSALITY IN MANY-WORLDS: HAVING YOUR CAKE AND EATING IT TOO.
- EXPLANATION FOUR: UNIVERSALITY IN MANY-WORLDS: INTERPRETING THEIMPOSSIBLE
- EXPLANATION FOUR: UNIVERSALITY IN MANY-WORLDS: PROLOGUE (IMPOSSIBLE BUT TRUE)
- EXPLANATION FOUR: UNIVERSALITY IN TIME: DEJA VIEW
- EXPLANATION FOUR: UNIVERSALITY IN SPACE: BEYOND THE FIELDS WE KNOW
- EXPLANATION FOUR: UNIVERSES ENSEMBLE! (Or--Multiple Choice!)
- EXPLANATION THREE: NECESSITY IS THE MOTHER OF...CREATION?
- EXPLANATION TWO: HIGH PROBABILITY---POSSIBLY
- EXPLANATION ONE: TAKE A CHANCE
- SIX COINCIDENCE CAUSES
- THE PHILOSOPHER'S FIRING SQUAD
- COINCIDENCE TWELVE: QUANTUM OF SCIENCE or SOMETIMES BOHR-ING IS GOOD
- COINCIDENCE ELEVEN: EXPANDING CONSTANTLY, PART TWO
- COINCIDENCE ELEVEN: EXPANDING CONSTANTLY, PART ONE
- COINCIDENCE TEN: A FINE LINE, or THE ALPHA FAIL
- OBJECTION TWO: THE PUDDLE IN THE DESERT
- COINCIDENCE NINE: ANTIMATTER ANGST AND ANOMALIES
- COINCIDENCE EIGHT: Neutron-Proton Mass Differences, or Sometimes it doesn't Pay to be Neutral
- OBJECTION ONE: The Size of the Universe
- COINCIDENCE SEVEN--You'll Get a Charge Out of This.
- COINCIDENCE SIX: 1/1836 IS YOUR LUCKY NUMBER.
- SETUP FOR COINCIDENCE SIX AND SEVEN
- PAUSE FOR REFLECTION: WAP, SAP, FAP, PAP And CRAP
- COINCIDENCE FIVE, Page 2: HIGHER DIMENSION DILEMMA
- COINCIDENCE FIVE, Page One: TWO-DIMENSIONAL CHARACTERS
- COINCIDENCE FOUR: HOW STRONG A CASE?
- A WEAK CASE FOR A WEAKLESS UNIVERSE
- COINCIDENCE THREE (A Weak Grasp of Timing)
- COINCIDENCE TWO, Page Four (Made Perfect in Weakness)
- COINCIDENCE TWO, Page 3 (Cooking a Supernova)
- COINCIDENCE TWO, Page Two (the Ghostly Particles)
- COINCIDENCE TWO, Page One (The Setup)
- COINCIDENCE ONE, Page Seven (Qualifications and Updates)
- COINCIDENCE ONE, Page Six (Eliminating Aliens)
- COINCIDENCE ONE, Page 5 (Goldilocks and the Just-Right Resonances)
- COINCIDENCE ONE, Page 4 (Remarkable Resonances)
- COINCIDENCE ONE, PAGE 3 (The Briefness of Beryllium)
- COINCIDENCE ONE, Page 2
- COINCIDENCE ONE, Page 1
- INTRODUCTION (EVOLUTION), Page 3
- INTRODUCTION (GROUND RULES), Page 2
- INTRODUCTION , Page 1
Next
Last
Author notes
If you want to get some idea how the nucleosynthesis, the formation of hydrogen and helium after the Big Bang is affected by the weak force, you can go here for a fuller explanation. We only have one example of life in the entire universe: Earth's. It's hard to make generalizations on one example, but we have to assume the Principle of Mediocrity–that the evolution of life on Earth isn't Atypical, isn't freakishly short or long…that we're not at the extreme far end, extremely longer than normal, or extremely short end, extremely shorter than normal. But a helium star only lasts under a million years. Not enough time for any lifeform similar to ours to evolve–about the only intelligent life in science fiction that MIGHT evolve in that short a time would be the neutron star-dwelling beings of Robert L. Forward's DRAGON EGG. Maybe. Multi-celled life is much older than we used to believe (we used to believe 600 million years old, but recent discoveries pushed it back to two billion years) but what little there was, was not complex at all. A helium star only lasts a relative short while by cosmic standards. Ten-thousandth the time a hydrogen star lasts–and three-thousandth the time it took you and me to evolve to walk the earth. Half the time, I could believe. One tenth, possibly. But one three-thousandth? The weak force constant range in which both Coincidences Two and Coincidences Three could happen–where type two Supernovas could happen (to spread higher elements to form planets and complex lifeforms) and stars lasting long enough for complex life to evolve–is very, VERY narrow. Next time we'll address some recent speculations on a "Weakless" universe, a universe totally without the weak force. Then–Coincidence Four.
Comments
Please login to comment.
Login or Register${ comment.author }} at
${ comment.author }} at