First
Prev
- SUMMATIONS
- THE POSSIBILITY OF REVELATION
- THE HIDDEN NATURE OF THE CREATOR
- THE PROVIDENT REALITY AND THE EQUALITY OF RAIN
- FREE MINDS AND FREE WILL
- AN ORDERED UNIVERSE--MADE TO ORDER?
- (A) PURPOSE FOR THE UNIVERSE
- COMMONALITIES
- VOICES AND PRESENCES
- SPECIAL CLAIMS, SPECIFIC EVIDENCE
- DO AS I SAY, NOT AS I DO
- ARROGANCE AND FAITH
- IMPLICATIONS AND SUGGESTIVE CLUES
- SOCIAL RELATIVISM ISN'T RELEVANT, PART TWO
- SOCIAL RELATIVISM ISN'T RELEVANT, PART ONE
- SOCIOBIOLOGY'S SHORTCOMINGS, PART TWO
- SOCIOBIOLOGY'S SHORTCOMINGS, PART ONE
- DODGING IMPLICATIONS
- EXISTENTIAL CRISIS IN EXISTENCE
- THE PROBLEM OF VALUES
- THE PROBLEM OF EVIL (PROLOGUE)
- TORNADO IN JUNK SCIENCE
- CHOOSING AMONG THE EXPLANATIONS
- EXPLANATION SIX: SOME IMPLICATIONS
- EXPLANATION SIX: SOMEONE ELSE'S LAB EXPERIMENT
- EXPLANATION SIX: THINKING CREATIVELY: APPROACHES AND LIMITS
- EXPLANATION SIX: THINKING CREATIVELY OR REWINDING THE WATCHMAKER
- EXPLANATION FIVE: SMOLIN'S SELECTION
- EXPLANATION FOUR: ENSEMBLES: AN OVERVIEW
- EXPLANATION FOUR: UNIVERSALITY IN MANY-WORLDS: DOES EVERYTHING POSSIBLE EXIST...SOMEWHERE?
- EXPLANATION FOUR: UNIVERSALITY IN MANY-WORLDS: HAVING YOUR CAKE AND EATING IT TOO.
- EXPLANATION FOUR: UNIVERSALITY IN MANY-WORLDS: INTERPRETING THEIMPOSSIBLE
- EXPLANATION FOUR: UNIVERSALITY IN MANY-WORLDS: PROLOGUE (IMPOSSIBLE BUT TRUE)
- EXPLANATION FOUR: UNIVERSALITY IN TIME: DEJA VIEW
- EXPLANATION FOUR: UNIVERSALITY IN SPACE: BEYOND THE FIELDS WE KNOW
- EXPLANATION FOUR: UNIVERSES ENSEMBLE! (Or--Multiple Choice!)
- EXPLANATION THREE: NECESSITY IS THE MOTHER OF...CREATION?
- EXPLANATION TWO: HIGH PROBABILITY---POSSIBLY
- EXPLANATION ONE: TAKE A CHANCE
- SIX COINCIDENCE CAUSES
- THE PHILOSOPHER'S FIRING SQUAD
- COINCIDENCE TWELVE: QUANTUM OF SCIENCE or SOMETIMES BOHR-ING IS GOOD
- COINCIDENCE ELEVEN: EXPANDING CONSTANTLY, PART TWO
- COINCIDENCE ELEVEN: EXPANDING CONSTANTLY, PART ONE
- COINCIDENCE TEN: A FINE LINE, or THE ALPHA FAIL
- OBJECTION TWO: THE PUDDLE IN THE DESERT
- COINCIDENCE NINE: ANTIMATTER ANGST AND ANOMALIES
- COINCIDENCE EIGHT: Neutron-Proton Mass Differences, or Sometimes it doesn't Pay to be Neutral
- OBJECTION ONE: The Size of the Universe
- COINCIDENCE SEVEN--You'll Get a Charge Out of This.
- COINCIDENCE SIX: 1/1836 IS YOUR LUCKY NUMBER.
- SETUP FOR COINCIDENCE SIX AND SEVEN
- PAUSE FOR REFLECTION: WAP, SAP, FAP, PAP And CRAP
- COINCIDENCE FIVE, Page 2: HIGHER DIMENSION DILEMMA
- COINCIDENCE FIVE, Page One: TWO-DIMENSIONAL CHARACTERS
- COINCIDENCE FOUR: HOW STRONG A CASE?
- A WEAK CASE FOR A WEAKLESS UNIVERSE
- COINCIDENCE THREE (A Weak Grasp of Timing)
- COINCIDENCE TWO, Page Four (Made Perfect in Weakness)
- COINCIDENCE TWO, Page 3 (Cooking a Supernova)
- COINCIDENCE TWO, Page Two (the Ghostly Particles)
- COINCIDENCE TWO, Page One (The Setup)
- COINCIDENCE ONE, Page Seven (Qualifications and Updates)
- COINCIDENCE ONE, Page Six (Eliminating Aliens)
- COINCIDENCE ONE, Page 5 (Goldilocks and the Just-Right Resonances)
- COINCIDENCE ONE, Page 4 (Remarkable Resonances)
- COINCIDENCE ONE, PAGE 3 (The Briefness of Beryllium)
- COINCIDENCE ONE, Page 2
- COINCIDENCE ONE, Page 1
- INTRODUCTION (EVOLUTION), Page 3
- INTRODUCTION (GROUND RULES), Page 2
- INTRODUCTION , Page 1
Next
Last
First
Prev
- SUMMATIONS
- THE POSSIBILITY OF REVELATION
- THE HIDDEN NATURE OF THE CREATOR
- THE PROVIDENT REALITY AND THE EQUALITY OF RAIN
- FREE MINDS AND FREE WILL
- AN ORDERED UNIVERSE--MADE TO ORDER?
- (A) PURPOSE FOR THE UNIVERSE
- COMMONALITIES
- VOICES AND PRESENCES
- SPECIAL CLAIMS, SPECIFIC EVIDENCE
- DO AS I SAY, NOT AS I DO
- ARROGANCE AND FAITH
- IMPLICATIONS AND SUGGESTIVE CLUES
- SOCIAL RELATIVISM ISN'T RELEVANT, PART TWO
- SOCIAL RELATIVISM ISN'T RELEVANT, PART ONE
- SOCIOBIOLOGY'S SHORTCOMINGS, PART TWO
- SOCIOBIOLOGY'S SHORTCOMINGS, PART ONE
- DODGING IMPLICATIONS
- EXISTENTIAL CRISIS IN EXISTENCE
- THE PROBLEM OF VALUES
- THE PROBLEM OF EVIL (PROLOGUE)
- TORNADO IN JUNK SCIENCE
- CHOOSING AMONG THE EXPLANATIONS
- EXPLANATION SIX: SOME IMPLICATIONS
- EXPLANATION SIX: SOMEONE ELSE'S LAB EXPERIMENT
- EXPLANATION SIX: THINKING CREATIVELY: APPROACHES AND LIMITS
- EXPLANATION SIX: THINKING CREATIVELY OR REWINDING THE WATCHMAKER
- EXPLANATION FIVE: SMOLIN'S SELECTION
- EXPLANATION FOUR: ENSEMBLES: AN OVERVIEW
- EXPLANATION FOUR: UNIVERSALITY IN MANY-WORLDS: DOES EVERYTHING POSSIBLE EXIST...SOMEWHERE?
- EXPLANATION FOUR: UNIVERSALITY IN MANY-WORLDS: HAVING YOUR CAKE AND EATING IT TOO.
- EXPLANATION FOUR: UNIVERSALITY IN MANY-WORLDS: INTERPRETING THEIMPOSSIBLE
- EXPLANATION FOUR: UNIVERSALITY IN MANY-WORLDS: PROLOGUE (IMPOSSIBLE BUT TRUE)
- EXPLANATION FOUR: UNIVERSALITY IN TIME: DEJA VIEW
- EXPLANATION FOUR: UNIVERSALITY IN SPACE: BEYOND THE FIELDS WE KNOW
- EXPLANATION FOUR: UNIVERSES ENSEMBLE! (Or--Multiple Choice!)
- EXPLANATION THREE: NECESSITY IS THE MOTHER OF...CREATION?
- EXPLANATION TWO: HIGH PROBABILITY---POSSIBLY
- EXPLANATION ONE: TAKE A CHANCE
- SIX COINCIDENCE CAUSES
- THE PHILOSOPHER'S FIRING SQUAD
- COINCIDENCE TWELVE: QUANTUM OF SCIENCE or SOMETIMES BOHR-ING IS GOOD
- COINCIDENCE ELEVEN: EXPANDING CONSTANTLY, PART TWO
- COINCIDENCE ELEVEN: EXPANDING CONSTANTLY, PART ONE
- COINCIDENCE TEN: A FINE LINE, or THE ALPHA FAIL
- OBJECTION TWO: THE PUDDLE IN THE DESERT
- COINCIDENCE NINE: ANTIMATTER ANGST AND ANOMALIES
- COINCIDENCE EIGHT: Neutron-Proton Mass Differences, or Sometimes it doesn't Pay to be Neutral
- OBJECTION ONE: The Size of the Universe
- COINCIDENCE SEVEN--You'll Get a Charge Out of This.
- COINCIDENCE SIX: 1/1836 IS YOUR LUCKY NUMBER.
- SETUP FOR COINCIDENCE SIX AND SEVEN
- PAUSE FOR REFLECTION: WAP, SAP, FAP, PAP And CRAP
- COINCIDENCE FIVE, Page 2: HIGHER DIMENSION DILEMMA
- COINCIDENCE FIVE, Page One: TWO-DIMENSIONAL CHARACTERS
- COINCIDENCE FOUR: HOW STRONG A CASE?
- A WEAK CASE FOR A WEAKLESS UNIVERSE
- COINCIDENCE THREE (A Weak Grasp of Timing)
- COINCIDENCE TWO, Page Four (Made Perfect in Weakness)
- COINCIDENCE TWO, Page 3 (Cooking a Supernova)
- COINCIDENCE TWO, Page Two (the Ghostly Particles)
- COINCIDENCE TWO, Page One (The Setup)
- COINCIDENCE ONE, Page Seven (Qualifications and Updates)
- COINCIDENCE ONE, Page Six (Eliminating Aliens)
- COINCIDENCE ONE, Page 5 (Goldilocks and the Just-Right Resonances)
- COINCIDENCE ONE, Page 4 (Remarkable Resonances)
- COINCIDENCE ONE, PAGE 3 (The Briefness of Beryllium)
- COINCIDENCE ONE, Page 2
- COINCIDENCE ONE, Page 1
- INTRODUCTION (EVOLUTION), Page 3
- INTRODUCTION (GROUND RULES), Page 2
- INTRODUCTION , Page 1
Next
Last
Author notes
See? What did I say last time? 3 large space dimensions and one large time dimension is about the only combination in which intelligent life can arise. The philosopher Immanual Kant was the first to realize the connection between the number of dimensions in space and the inverse-square law, and how it would differ if the number of spatial differed. Hmmm. If fifth-dimensional information processing is always distorted—no WONDER Superman could trick Myztlplk so easily into saying his name backwards and returning to the Fifth Dimension for ninety days! It would be a wonder for any fifth-dimensional entity to think clearly at ALL. Actually some particles in higher dimensional spaces might remain stable—but only in really, really low temperatures. Like not much above absolute zero. Conceivably some of Larry Niven's Helium II lifeforms might survive in such higher dimensonality…but then, through the wave-distortion problem of odd-numbered higher dimensons, their chances of becoming intelligent is much rarer. (See Max Tegmark's "On the Dimensionality of Space Time" for not only a more detailed look at the effects of multiple time dimensions but a look at the spiraling problem in higher dimensional spaces.) Recently, an explanation was offered : three researchers, associate professor at KEK Jun Nishimura, associate professor at Shizuoka University Asato Tsuchiya, and project researcher at Osaka University Sang-Woo Kim, used a supercomputer to generate a model of the universe’s birth based on superstring theory. Their results indicated at the moment of the Big Bang, the universe had 10 dimensions – 9 spatial and 1 temporal – but only 3 of these spatial dimensions expanded. Partial explanation, at least. (But even if true, it only moves the coincidence involved back another step.) Maybe. Superstring theory still has a lot of hoops to jump through before it's anywhere near proved.
Comments
Please login to comment.
Login or Register${ comment.author }} at
${ comment.author }} at