Sources: Geprge Greenstein's THE SYMBIOTIC UNIVERSE and Barrow and Tipler's THE COSMIC ANTHROPIC PRINCIPLE (Chapter 6.6). Here's a good on-line reference on why neutrons decay in fifteen minutes on their own but stay stable in nuclei at Neutron Stability in Atomic Nuclei. I based the last two panels on Barrow and Tipler's work, but it's worth nothing there is at least one dispute on that. In The Evidence for Fine-Tuning, Robin Collins argues that even if the neutron were less massive, there might be a path for two neutrons to covert into a deuteron (a proton and a neutron) and an electron. "Since these sorts of conversions appear to be allowed, the only effects we can immediately deduce that a moderate decrease of the neutron mass would have are that stars would burn very differently and that stable nuclei, including hydrogen, would shift towards having a higher proportion of neutrons than we presently find. I know of no current well-developed argument, however, that these effects would inhibit the existence of intelligent life. This is an area that needs further exploration." A good theoretical model of what the universe would be like in such an instance is lacking. And it would require that such a mass differential to be a very moderate one–i.e., within prescribed limits. NEXT: ANTIMATTER ANGST AND ANOMALIES
Comments
Please login to comment.
Login or Register${ comment.author }} at
${ comment.author }} at