Lost

Author notes

33: uncomfy truth

Sysli

on March 21, 2009

Like I said last week: Heh heh heh.

Nah, really, it kinda makes sense to me. But that may just tell you something about how messed up I am and nothing about the logic of his words and Narrator's reaction.

Also:
Reading about comics (as I've been doing lately) really makes me wonder if I'm allowed to call Lost one. It falls outside pretty much all the definitions I've run into so far exept perhaps Scott McClouds, but I'm not even sure that one holds if I thing it through.
Bob:tLaDoT lacks the "text" in the text/picture combination that most of them love to refer to as part of the comic-genre, but it does have a "story" and it is told in pictures read from left to right as is standart in this part of the world. But Lost? It has the texxt, but I admit that most of the time the pictures and the words seem to be only partially telling the same story, so I guess it could be described as an oddly illustrated story rather than a comic? Then again, if it were an illustrated story the pictures would add nothing to the text, and that doesn't seem to be the case as I do try to hint at things through the use of them. Sometimes More than others. And if there's one thing the books agree on, it's that comics aren't just illustrated stories, there's more to them than that.
Comic definitions: Messing with my mind and making me wonder what it is Im doing.