ozoneocean wrote:
Hahaha! As long as I get called handsome :)
Not me. One thing I will not abide is a damn liar!
Start publishing on
DD Comics!
ozoneocean wrote:
Hahaha! As long as I get called handsome :)
I decided to retire from breeding rats, a hobby older than all my other hobbies. I started in 2001. Man, life can change a lot in 20 years. I had the rats through it all. (I was a teenager when I started. o_o I am now an old.)
I nearly lost a favorite pet in labor in February. But I wanted to end on a high note, so I have some new baby rats, my last baby rats. Tbh, it feels pretty good. I loved breeding but it was stressful, and hobbies should bring joy, not heartache. I'm keeping nine of my 15 new babies. I plan to continue keeping rats in the future but not breeding them.
I love genetics and breeding. My plan is to eventually get a couple acres and raise chickens. I have three pet hens now (middle of the city, small city yard). Chickens are fun and easy, and (most importantly) I don't feel any emotional bond to them.
L.C.Stein wrote:Thankyou!
Good luck, Oz!!
Banes wrote:Awwww, you're pretty though ^_^
Not me. One thing I will not abide is a damn liar!
usedbooks wrote:WHOA! That's the end of an era!!!! Probably best though, yes. You've been involved with them for so long O_O
I decided to retire from breeding rats, a hobby older than all my other hobbies.
Ozoneocean wrote:I plan to continue staying involved with them, as pets. Just not the stresses of breeding. I feel way too guilty when things go wrong, and too anxious about finding good homes. – Plus, when I started, all I had were the rats. I was in college, no cats or dogs allowed in the apartment. I own a house now. I have more than rats. ;)usedbooks wrote:WHOA! That's the end of an era!!!! Probably best though, yes. You've been involved with them for so long O_O
I decided to retire from breeding rats, a hobby older than all my other hobbies.
usedbooks wrote:
I love genetics and breeding. My plan is to eventually get a couple acres and raise chickens. I have three pet hens now (middle of the city, small city yard). Chickens are fun and easy, and (most importantly) I don't feel any emotional bond to them.
Live in Hawaii like my niece does and you'll have free range chickens walking around your yard.
My sister-in-law raises chickens. Pheasants didn't work out well because the eggs though tasty are tiny. Though Amazon has reasonable deal on a plucking tool.
My great uncles raised carrier pigeons for racing. Used to be a thing that people did.
Chickens are the easiest animals I ever kept. Very self-sufficient. I live in a place that has 90+ degree summer days and at least a couple good winter snows. They manage heat with no problem (just need water and shade). For cold, they just need a pile of straw in the coop and huddle together. Pick hardy breeds and you're set.
The coop I made them is a dog pen wrapped in hardware cloth and covered in a tarp. Feed is cheap, and they can eat pretty much any food scraps.
Out in the country, people lose chickens to predators a lot. The only thing I know is lurking in my urban neighborhood is a skunk. Several of my neighbors have hens, and two have roosters. One has lost a few chickens, but she doesn't have a secure coop. They just roam her yard.
Chickens are supremely stupid animals, though. Bird intelligence runs a spectrum and chickens are definitely at the low end. It makes them pretty reptilian (and predictable, since they follow instinct and routine). Tbh, it's refreshing to have animals around that I don't feel so sentimentally attached to.
Where my sister in law lives has foxes and it's suburban. With all the building up every patch of woods in Woodbridge township has a full menagerie of wildlife and feral cats. A few years ago found a new born kitten outside a nearby building while working security in a refinery.
bravo1102 wrote:I've seen opossum tracks on my porch basically in the middle of a city. I've seen raccoon roadkill on the street too. There's more urban wildlife than we realize. (Haven't had a bear in my neighborhood yet, but they've been within five miles.)
Where my sister in law lives has foxes and it's suburban. With all the building up every patch of woods in Woodbridge township has a full menagerie of wildlife and feral cats. A few years ago found a new born kitten outside a nearby building while working security in a refinery.
There are foxes, rabits and feral cats here to and I'm on the coastal side of a highly urbanised area that's been urbanised for over 150 years. One has to wonder HOW feral foxes even GOT here! Bunnies and cats are understandable, they could escape or be released any time. But Foxes were never kept as pets… They are not native here and just don't even EXIST here normally.
They were probably introduced over 150 years ago for hunting in certain areas and have somehow manged to eek it out in the narrow stretches of vacent land and small patches of bush between the suburban sprawl of city and the beach.
These creatures ar so WELL adapted to living along side humans.
I really feel that this sort of thing is a sorely neglegcted aspect of the study of nature and animals- animal populations that increase because they adapt so well to human populations.
- people are SO completely focused on "native animals" that suffer, but never about those (as well as ferrals) that do the oposite AND how those impact native animals.
They only focus on ferral cats.
But in the city here there are many native species that exploded in populations because of humans and have massively impacted other native species.
—–
Even things like bumble bees and honey bees. All over the world these creatures are responsible for the death and decline of native polinators. People still buy into the crap about the decline of bees but the reality is that the honey industry is soley reposnible for that issue. They instodued and non-native species, killed off the native ones, and then created unsustaibaley giant populations with genetic simalarities with intestive farming practices that are prone to disease and other weaknesses… Of course there will be die offs. It's the fault of the honey industry.
/rant
Sorry, this stuff is a huge and complex subject and I always dive into it
With our panic driven mass media, the facts about animal populations gets lost in hype. Population will fluctuate. There will be die-offs but species are pretty good at adaptation. The symbiotic nature of various non or semi domesticated species with humans has been studied, especially when it comes to rats. You always read about a species being displaced but the studies on survival, even thriving among humans is there but it doesn't fit into the sensationalist media reporting model. Panic persists. But good news pops up and is forgotten.
Take deer in NJ. Humans got rid of their natural predators so they're everywhere. Constant hazard on many roads. If wolves cougars and bears were still around wouldn't have these problems, but instead we have humans. Deer populations are regulated by predators. That's how the ecosystem works. But it's hunters killing Bambi! It's the same thing as a lion on the plains of Africa, just this predator is wearing bark skin camouflage and an orange hat.
Tell me about it… I have a Romanian friend that keeps on posting about the record numbers of bear attacks in Romania now that bears are protected and the population is exploding. Wolves too.
I take that with a pinch of salt because he's pro-hunting, but there's no denying there have been some horrible attacks.
———————–
Great interview with Bluecuts, Damehelsing and Pitface on the Quackcast tomorrow, talking about the DD Horror anthology!
ew. Webtoons… blow it up :P
Congrats on your achievement Scarf!
————–
I wish we had more feedback on the new comic page organisation feature https://next.theduckwebcomics.com/news/2021/aug/05/we-need-you-to-test-a-new-website-feature/
Oh god… listening to a show on radio 4 and this person is going on about being a witch, wicca, paganism, the occult, poltergeist etc.
…and yet she has a degree in anthropology. UGH!
That's like becoming a vaccine denier even though you're a doctor… although that also happens so it's a bad example :(
I don't mind people having fun with the imagery and mythology of magic and stuff, it's fun. It can look cool.
But don't think any of it's real. You're not 5 years old.
Ozoneocean wrote:
Oh god… listening to a show on radio 4 and this person is going on about being a witch, wicca, paganism, the occult, poltergeist etc.
…and yet she has a degree in anthropology. UGH!
That's like becoming a vaccine denier even though you're a doctor… although that also happens so it's a bad example :(
I don't mind people having fun with the imagery and mythology of magic and stuff, it's fun. It can look cool.
But don't think any of it's real. You're not 5 years old.
Genejoke wrote:Anthropology is a science, I tell you!
It's no different than any other religion really.Ozoneocean wrote:
…and yet she has a degree in anthropology. UGH!
dpat57 wrote:It most definitely is as the recent reevaluation of a lot of classic work is showing. Margaret Mead was a bunch of hooey? Natives tell investigators what they think the investigators want to hear and even play them for fools?Genejoke wrote:Anthropology is a science, I tell you!
It's no different than any other religion really.Ozoneocean wrote:
…and yet she has a degree in anthropology. UGH!
dpat57 wrote:Genejoke wrote:Anthropology is a science, I tell you!
It's no different than any other religion really.Ozoneocean wrote:
…and yet she has a degree in anthropology. UGH!
DDComics is community owned.
The following patrons help keep the lights on. You can support DDComics on Patreon.